Return of the Term

It’s ba-ack! The term, that is. Run and hide in fear!

Actually, this term isn’t half so bad as last term. Half the classes, pretty much, and nearly down by half the enrollments. One class is brand-spanking new: a seminar on later medieval chronicles. However, since I’d planned and proposed this course several years ago as a logical extension of my existing seminar in early medieval chronicles, it feels familiar. The other undergraduate course is my survey of the ancient Near East and that course really is a well-oiled machine thanks to a fabulous textbook and a lot of planning in the past. It takes relatively little time to update material when it’s this well-organized. Finally, the graduate reading course appears like it will continue to be a rewarding class that I have two students working on overlapping material so they can support each other more readily.

The best part of this term, however? Not teaching five days a week. Really, if I’m going to be ramping up my research and publishing the way I’m supposed to do so, I need a day to step back and really get things done without interruption. Even if I leave myself copious “bread crumbs” in the form of notes, it takes some time to get the writing and research back on track. That’s why I’m loving Mondays, now!

Of course, Murphy’s Law meant that I had to make an unexpected trip into campus to ensure a student’s letter of recommendation got in on time. Oh, well. The day was still pretty darned productive as I simply zipped on and off campus as quickly as possible so I could get back to my revisions. I’m happy to report those are done and hopefully there will be many more productive Mondays in the weeks to come.

2 Comments

Filed under academe, teaching, writing/editing

Ask the Right Question

Last term I instituted a new scheme in my intermediate level courses: require short presentations on pre-assigned discussion questions from every student and recycle those questions as essay fodder for the tests and exams. It’s done a fair bit of what I want: ensure that even in a class of eighty, students were speaking every day without my resorting to picking faces out of the crowd. It also led to a lively culture on the discussion boards in our course software as part of the mark was not only for oral presentation, but for posting a polished version of that classroom comment and then responding to others.

I’ve had a lot of positive feedback from students who’ve appreciated this system, particularly that the questions are provided ahead of time so they can prepare for class with that opening theme in mind as well as know that can guide them in test preparation. I’m sure that there are others who’re not quite so happy, of course. I hope none of them are as disenchanted as this group of students at Utah Valley University but I do have tenure and a supportive administration behind me. (Of course, I accommodate students who can’t do oral presentations, say, for the student who has a nasty sore throat on the day – they can provide me a short paragraph, suitable to project via PowerPoint and I’ll share that in class with an invitation for the entire class to respond. But there were only 3 students who needed that accommodation in last term’s survey of eighty!)

I’m finding that the most difficult part of this is designing the best question that I can for each class session. I’m writing questions with the day’s reading in mind. Sometimes the text offers a great opening for interpretation and debate. Other times the ‘angle’ isn’t so obvious and I waffle for hours, reworking the question until I find something with which I’m happy. Because I’ve committed myself to not only using the questions in the class session, but also in the tests, they also have to be open for a broader, thematic analysis when it comes time for the quiz, midterm or semester final exam. So spending time on the questions pays off. That’s how I spent a great deal of time in the week leading up to course launch: tweaking with the discussion question list. Now it’s set in stone and I have a bunch of class sessions already full subscribed with students who’re excited to prepare for their turn.

They’re not magic tools but pre-circulated discussion questions with students presentations are definitely staying in my survey repetoire!

6 Comments

Filed under history, teaching

Once More Into the Breach

Classes start on Wednesday. I start teaching again on Thursday morning and I’m sort of, almost!, ready. My Desire2Learn shell is up and running for the second-year survey on the Ancient Near East and the course outline was in our admin’s hands well before term wrapped up. Preparing the online component of the course was a chore and a half. I realize I still have one assignment folder still to create: the discussions assignment since I’m continuing last term’s successful experiment in requiring discussions in a large-scale sophomore survey. I require every student in the class of eighty to present on the daily discussion question once during the term, post a refined version of their response and then respond to at least two others. That means that some days we can have five presentations! They’re all short (I advise students not to prepare more than a page of text to guide them) but I sweeten the pot by recycling the questions for essays on the tests so students have incentive to prepare and pay attention!

I’ve also finally figured out the intractable scheduling problem for the senior seminar: in order to spend two weeks on The Alexiad, we’re covering Villehardouin and Joinville in one week. Since the latter two are only in excerpts in our course custom reader, that’s okay in my book. I’m happily anticipating finally teaching this inaugural seminar on later medieval chronicles and that means taking some time with some sources (they’ll also read all of the Gesta Tancredi and The Chronicle of Bury St. Edmunds). We’re also going to start and finish the course with women authors: Anna Komnene and Margery Kempe – that has me excited!

However, I feel a little bit whip-lashed with term starting back up again so soon. I suspect my students will feel that even more as exams were scheduled right up until the 21st or 22nd. Everyone’s going to be tired and cranky when I head back to the office. We’re entering into the long, dark, bitterly cold heart of winter that doesn’t help one iota. January term is the cruelest term from that perspective!

How is the new year treating you?

4 Comments

Filed under teaching

Gaudete

Happy Holidays

Tempus adest gratiæ
Hoc quod optabamus,
Carmina lætitiæ
Devote reddamus.
- Piae Cantiones (1582)

(In other words, marking is done and I’m off to celebrate with my family!)

2 Comments

Filed under personal

Three Down, One to Go

I’ve submitted marks for three of my classes, now only the last group remains. It’s all down to how quickly I can plow through about seventy final exams. I don’t want to waste time counting them up: the total would be enough to make my cry in any case.

Once again, I will note my bemusement with the many students who have handed in not a single assignment for the course but still come in to write the final exam. Even when it’s worth 35% of the course mark, anyone should see that’s insufficient for a pass!

2 Comments

Filed under teaching

Cause Kittens Don’t Keep

There’s a new addition to the household: Sisu, the six-month-old Siberian. Her name is Finnish: a word that means determination in the face of adversity. Consider her the ultimate stress-reducer for the professor in grading jail: Sisu is shameless about crawling into my lap whether I have a laptop or a pile of papers. It slows me down a bit but I don’t mind.

DSC01059

16 Comments

Filed under pets

Grading Jail

It’s gotten to be that there’s so much end of term marking every December that I can no longer summon the energy to panic. I just mark as best I can, call it a day sometime around eleven at night and then get up too early in the morning to get the kids out the door before starting all over again.

Rubrics help: reducing my grading comments to focused feedback on the thesis and argumentation, the use of evidence, the proficiency of expression, etc. I’m telling students that if they want more detailed feedback, they’re encouraged to schedule a meeting or come by in office hours. Since so many students never pick up their final papers, I’ve finally realized that it’s a waste of my time to pour over all of the essays with a granular level of editing commentary.

So I’m in a zen state of marking as much as I can but not stressing too much about how much isn’t done. However, I’m not doing too much else that isn’t marking. I’m not watching TV (my DVR contains weeks of the one drama I would like to watch), reading any of my leisure books or I’ve only spent three hours (absolutely mandatory) on my own research in the past two weeks. I’m more than a little bit resentful about social obligations and meetings eating into my marking time, mind you – can’t we get together AFTER markings all done? But if you wonder why this blog is so quiet, my confinement to grading jail is a big part of that.

9 Comments

Filed under academe, teaching

You Can’t Alway Teach What You Want

It’s that time of year when we start nailing down next year’s course offerings. As our department has lost a boatload of faculty over the past few years (we’re down five full-time people and not down that many students), it’s a careful negotiation these days to figure out exactly what has to be offered so that students can finish their degrees and the minimum requirements for the program are maintained.

Practically, this means that a fair chunk of my teaching time is given over to obligatory courses. For the past several years, I’ve had to teach a term of western civ and a term of graduate methods. Even on my sabbatical years, I teach these as I only take one-term sabbaticals. So I begin to get a wee bit tired of the slog. The colleague who could relieve me on western civ has gotten a permanent position at a different campus. The colleagues who could relieve me of the graduate methods are teaching other obligatory courses or otherwise unavailable.

We all have some sort or another of obligatory course to teach in this brave new world of shrunken staffing levels. At least we have the prospect of hiring a few sessionals, albeit on a course-by-course basis. Excellence without money as Historiann would say! A few sessionals do not full-time faculty replace, however. When it comes to obligatory courses on methods, theory or both, all of which have been carefully designed to meet specific needs for majors in our curriculum, we’re wary of handing those off to outsiders. (And don’t get me started on how maddening it is to be short-staffed and only be able to offer course-by-course sessionals to other historians. The job crunch is real and alive at our campus, just as at others.)

That leaves me with three term courses in my regular full-year load. A lot to choose from, you’d think? Wrong! Two of those term courses have to be reserved for senior seminars. While teaching seniors can be a privilege, my senior seminars aren’t right up my research alley most years: they’re conceived of as appropriate capstones to popular electives that are on the books. For example, this year I have senior seminars on early and late medieval chronicles, building on students taking the early and late medieval surveys in the previous years. Next year, I’ll fill up the slots with seminars on Tudor and Stuart Britain (closer to my research focus).

If you’re keeping track at home, however, two senior seminars on whatever topic means I now have one term-long elective slot to offer. Argh! I have to choose wisely so it can be a useful support for whatever senior seminar I’m likely to offer in the year following. SO I’m slotting in a third-year elective on the Reformation and Counter-Reformation as I expect I’ll have seminars on gender and the life-cycle in early modern Europe for 2013-14.

Then, of course, there’s the obligatory graduate overload: for any graduate student I have (and there’ll be at least one), there’s a directed reading course (two terms in total). It comes with a nominal payment, mind you, so I’m not teaching it for free, but it is a LOT of work since the course has to be crafted to the graduate student’s interest (and the overlap between what my graduate students study and what I research is vanishingly small).

In an ideal world, we’d have enough faculty that we could cycle through the first year course options instead of offering the same two, year after year. That’d give me the occasional year off from western civ and the teaching space to throw in another elective from my many possible preps. The last time I taught my women’s history survey was when I was pregnant with Eldest. She’s in her third year of high school. There’s nothing more frustrating as an educator than having courses you want to teach but can’t.

For six years, now, another colleague and I have wistfully plotted out the possibility of team-teaching a survey course in pre-modern war. We designed the course and it’s occasionally taught on our other campus by a colleague. It’s never been taught here because slotting it in would require us to rejigger a number of obligatory courses so that we could pair it up with one of those to get our full teaching load for a term. But if we swap the obligatory course with another faculty member, that leaves us short in other areas. The house of cards collapses. The tetris blocks reach the top.

Maybe the year after next?

4 Comments

Filed under teaching

Droolworthy Digital Resources

Sharon Howard, at Early Modern Notes has alerted us to a new project in which she’s involved: Manuscripts Online: Written Culture from 1000 to 1500. Colour me excited!

She describes it as a kind of Connected Histories for medievalists. That’s also a fabulous resource for anyone working on British history circa 1500-1900. With resources such as this and my beloved materials linked via London Lives, 1690-1800 and the perennial favourite, Old Bailey Online, 1674-1913.

I tell my students they have little idea how fortunate they are. Digitization has revolutionized so much of the gruntwork of historical research. Whereas we were fortunate to have microfilms and microfiche of some manuscripts and many early books at my doctoral institution, a lot had to be taken on faith that the research trip to the other side of a continent or the other side of an ocean would pay off. Current students can get a good hard first look at a lot of research material online. Some of the digitization is of such high quality and so extensive (many of these sites are not only images, but include adeptly managed text conversion with connections to a searchable database) that you can use the material for so many digital humanities hacks.

I’m thinking that, if I have the time for next fall, to rejig part of my methods course for the grad students so that they practice with using and creating a small version of such a project. I’d have to identify a suitable source or set of sources and get an installation of Omeka, software to support elegant and extensible online exhibitions, up and running. Obviously, nothing I can tackle right now as I’m snowed under with marking, editing and writing, but definitely a goal for the near future.

Hrm. I wonder if this small digital humanities project might be suitable for an internal-to-the-university research grant?

Comments Off

Filed under academe, history, teaching

Twilight: The Source of All Evil?

So, Breaking Dawn, Part I is out and judging from reports, tickets were selling like hotcakes. This made for much wailing on the part of cultural critics and film reviewers everywhere.

I have to admit, I’m not a great fan of the films and I had problems with aspects of the books but others I loved. I certainly don’t think Meyer’s books and the resulting movies are as bad as the onslaught of reviewers’ complaints make them out to be. That puts me in a minority!

Apparently, the collapse of western civilization can be attributed to the Twilight fandom. Especially because it’s all girly in all the ways that women shouldn’t be. At least according to just about every cultural commentator whose reports I’ve seen popping up on my TV or computer screen. See The Franchise That Ate Feminism or tbe Twitterverse’s recent comments on the red state/blue state US mapping: Do You Live in the Twilight Belt? for examples of these visceral reactions.

Meyer’s story hits a trifecta of topics to sneer at: it’s aimed at young women (universally decried for their lack of taste and judgment), it intersects with genre fiction/film (so ‘true fans’ of the genre decry the pollution that is Twilight at Comic-con) and it also promotes conservative/anti-feminist values. What’s not there for a critic to savage?

I’m not saying you have to like or dislike Twilight. I am saying that I find that too many critics are following the easy path of establishing their credibility by snarking up a storm about the films, the books and their fans. You may not get the appeal, you may have problems with the books and movies, but please stop with the suggestions that fans are dangerously unhinged!

It’s nice to see The New York Times bucking the trend. The reviewer actually seems to enjoy the film and finds a lot to praise in the director’s work (even if Taylor Lautner comes in for some pointed derision in terms of his acting ability). Still won’t convince me to see the movie in the theatre (I don’t like blood and I know there’s a lot that’ll be an integral part of the story) but I sure will watch it on DVD if just to see what all the fuss is about.

Comments Off

Filed under pop culture